Do you hate Jews and blacks as well as men and gays? Hanged for a sheep and all that…

im actually jewish and i dont hate gays… im just saying that if a man wants a women to die they must be gay thats all.

*actually this post goes to all you fucking fags…*

*i dont hate gays…*

No, of course not…

@WOMEN

—– “im just saying that if a man wants a women to die they must be gay that’s all” ——-

Really?

Here’s a newsflash for you stupid cunts:

I can want you to FUCK OFF AND DIE, and still want to fuck another woman’s pussy INSTEAD OF YOURS.

FACT–>> YOU CUNTS ARE NOT SPECIAL ENOUGH to think that if a man doesn’t want you around, he “must be gay”.

Lets repeat that again, so that you can really grasp it.

NO WOMAN IS SPECIAL ENOUGH to think that if a man doesn’t want her around, he “must be gay”.

That’s what a break-up is.
He doesn’t WANT YOU.
He is getting ANOTHER pussy instead.

THAT’S NOT A MAN’S PROBLEM —>> ITS YOURS.

Menarebetterathanwomen.

That’s WAAAAAAAY above a woman’s head, man.

The idea that her pussy is so valuable that a man would have to be a cocksucker if he doesn’t want it is impossible for women to get.

Because women are really that stupid, I usually agree and tell them “you’re right I am gay, now will you leave?”

Even that doesn’t work. I dump women and TELL them I am gay and they still want my cock. Fuck its so annoying.

Maybe killing women really is the only solution.

You know , I have done that too AND THE CUNTS STILL WON’T LEAVE!!

“You’re right I am gay, NOW will you leave?”

It definitely doesn’t work to tell women you are gay. It just makes them want to stay around MORE.

Commander Scott might really be onto something here.

In order to get women to WANT to leave so he can get whatever pussy he wants without her annoying cunt in her face, a man must use drastic measures.

You can’t just tap a woman on the shoulder. Women have no manners, or standards and are way tool fucking stupid for that.

Let’s consider what we have proven does NOT work
at getting rid of women:

• “Please leave”
• “Get the fuck out of my face you stupid cunt”
• The vilest Insults imaginable.
• Signs that say women are not welcome or invited
• Cheating on her
• Paying another woman for ultra-raunchy sex.

. . . ALL OF THE ABOVE FAIL AT GETTING RID OF WOMEN.

I guess that just leaves rape and killing as the only options I haven’t tried. Does it really have to come to that?

menarebetterthanwomen.

ASK O.J. - He would know. Raping a women to get rid of her is a very interesting idea. If they didn’t enjoy it so much, it might actually work.

PsychGeek, physiology can’t explain them all, you need more knowledge because physiology is very limited in lots of areas and can mislead you.

Feminism simply put want men enslaved and those that can’t be enslaved to be exterminated.

And the current laws show just that, you should learn some law not just physiology and you’ll get the whole picture.

You can’t form patterns for everybody, those patterns will be flawed and you’ll misjudge those for whom you try to get their thinking patterns.

studioline, give it up. You can’t spell or form a coherent sentence - there’s no point in pretending it’s because you’re busy “packing”.

Psychology isn’t a science. Sociobiology IS.

i have it well explained about the science behind psychology.

read on to find it.

read on if you want to see my explanation of the science behind psychology.

and sociobiology is to psychology as a squirt gun is to a hydrogen bomb.

also did you know that mental retardation is more common in our gender than in women? just a tid-bit of information. not really relevant but it’s interesting.

So is genius IQ and vast intellectual achievement.

Women are mediocre.

not really, both are better at different things… men are more creative (hence more artists and builders scientists) while women use more logic and language (better at math, languages, grammar, spelling, writing, problem solving, and memory)

there are so few men and women collectivley these days with genius IQ that the rest of the world seems very stupid… being a male (like myself) i’ve noticed that even though i’m a genius, that dosen’t make the rest of the gender any smarter. it just mean that i am genetically superior to any other man in the area of brain power. however, there is always a trade off. i was never good at sports, that dosen’t mean i’m fat or unhealthy, i was never coordinated or athletic enough for sports.

you’d be suprised what women can do. you seem to be basing your judgements on the average teen girl, who sadly from my experiance, is far more immature than a grown woman.

That’s not true, my friend. The higher the IQ level, the more males are represented. Hence a higher proportion of males are Mensans, though a FAR higher proportion are in Sigma mind. Of course, I admit far more males are retarded, also. The answer lies in socio-biology: males display more intellectual and physical variance, because males bear the brunt of reproductive intra-species competition.

There is much greater variability in personality and behaviour amongst males, than amongst females; it is exceedingly difficult to construct a body of multivariate statistical analysis that can rigidly predetermine the biomechanical operation of male socio-sexual functioning; this is because men tend to cluster around the very extremes of any trait that is either expressed phenotypically/ genotypically, or one that is ultimately the natural by-product of socio-cultural adaptation. Thus, men tend to be all things in all times and places.

However, women tend to be roughly homogeneous in both personality and behaviour. The female of the species always tends to cluster around the middle of any Gaussian distribution that statistically calculates the relative probability of any trait being distributed throughout a given population demographic. Thus, because women tend to be relatively uniform in all places and times, they tend to operate as a collective organism functioning within the confines of an amorphous social network, the boundaries of which are ultimately defined by the biological parameters of the maternal instinct.

Where did he go?

i’m going on with my life, you my friend should follow suit.

also scot, while you have the first well worded and valid point, i do happen to notice that various people in the behavourial field tend to differ vastly in opinion.

thank you very much for using your brain and showing that not all of us men are drooling retards who throw “fuck” into a sentence to give it meaning.

so scott, by your standards, if i am psychic, then all of the male gender is psychic? and if i am smarter, than all of the backwoods retarded hicks in the world are now more intelligent?

what if i’m born retarded? does that mean you are now slightly more retarded than you were before?

i fail to see where your logic is in that statement.

male sperm defects are the cause of mental retardation.

in fact there are very few accounts of natural eggs causing children with birth defects. usually if the woman is a smoker or has a history of drug use, the egg will be suseptible to genetic disorders.

I don’t think you understand what I’m trying to say.

What I meant to say was that men are many times more complex than women in terms of personality and behaviour. In other words, what we have is female conservatism on the one hand and male progressivism on the other; because of the great complexity of male socio-sexual behaviour, men vary much more in terms of human trait possession than women. The mere recognition of greater male variability in terms of both mental, emotional, and physical characteristics is something that has been known by Charles Darwin and discussed at great length by the celebrated English sexologist Havelock Ellis. The principle of male variance and monotonous female uniformity can be readily demonstrated on a mathematical level by constructing a Gaussian curve which plots the incidence of sexual dimorphism in male-female personality and behaviour. It will be seen from the standard normal distribution along the curve itself that not only do men have higher standard deviations than women but that men always have a tendency to cluster around the upper and lower extremes of the curve, whereas women, being generally homogeneous in both personality and behaviour, tend to have lower standard deviations and tend to gravitate towards the middle of the curve. Thus, there are more men of genius and high intelligence than women; more male daredevils than women; more male eccentrics than women; more males with tremendous athletic ability than women; more men with high levels of creativity than women; more men with a much greater sense of humour than women; more male criminals than women etc.

This is so because of three major reasons. Firstly, because alleles on both sex chromosomes present within the male genome are not coupled in the same dominant or recessive pairs as in the female; this means that there is nothing to mask the expression of gene replication errors in RNA transcription within the male lineage itself, ultimately producing a wide variation in both male temperament and phenotype. Secondly, men often bear the brunt of male-male competition for available females, and because of this are forced to become a kind of genetic filter for the species. And lastly, greater male variability is due to the presence of testosterone which enhances neuro-biological mechanisms for individual motivation within the male central nervous system, thus giving men a much greater drive to adapt and overcome whatever obstacles have been placed in their way by an unforgiving and merciless environment. All of these features are lacking in the human female, making women roughly homogeneous in both personality and behaviour across all times and places, all ethnicities and cultures.

Commander

Great work, but you should know a ’soft-science’ trained Gentile will struggle with this material.

nice copy and paste “commander intellect”

@psychGeek you’ve got your conclusion from the hemispheres mixed up. Indeed men have more amygdala activity in the right brain vs women in the left brain but that results in women attuning to their emotions more and men more to rational thought while the opposite sides are innervated, in other words its how the hemispheres interact not where the neurons are concentrated.